Are Trump and the EPA Going to Make Asbestos Great Again?

Chris White • April 15, 2026

Share this article

Are Trump and the EPA Going to Make Asbestos Great Again? Will EPA protect us from asbestos, or will EPA allow new asbestos containing products? Except for trial lawyer commercials, I don’t think asbestos has gotten as much news in the last 25 years as we’ve seen over the last couple of weeks. The EPA Significant New Use Rule on asbestos (SNUR) has caused quite a stir. 

Depending on what you read or who’s talking, the U.S. EPA is either taking proactive steps to protect us from still present asbestos hazards, or Trump and his buddies (including the Russians!) are looking to bring asbestos back because they don’t care about killing people while making a dollar (or ruble!). 

After reading the Significant New Use Rule and other articles on this story, I’m still not sure where I stand. I’ve tried to confine my thoughts on this to experience and common sense, but in some ways this story is so ridiculous that I can’t help but veer off into satire. Snopes has a very interesting article that’s worth checking out.

Fact: asbestos is a great construction material. It’s strong, extremely durable, and resists heat and chemical attacks. Here’s another fact: like a lot of other materials, it can be harmful. Don’t breathe it or swallow it. Unless you’re properly trained, equipped, accredited, and ready to do the work, don’t disturb it unless you’re serious. Kind of like picking up a gun. Don’t mess with it if you don’t know what you’re doing. But make no mistake – if asbestos weren’t harmful, we’d still be using it without restrictions. 

Asbestos products are still out there, so no, there’s never been a 100% complete ban on asbestos products here in the U.S. That means there’s no date cutoff for determining with absolute certainty that a building doesn’t contain asbestos, unless the building contains only wood or other materials that obviously don’t contain asbestos. That’s been the case – even before Barack Obama or Donald Trump took office. It might surprise you to find that some 300 metric tons of asbestos imported into the United States in 2017 alone. 

Having said that, finding asbestos in new buildings is pretty uncommon – but not unheard of.

We can’t let our guard down and think we no longer are susceptible to asbestos exposure risks. Even after 30 years in the asbestos business, we still see poorly planned and executed renovation and demolition projects in buildings of all ages – much of the time without determining if asbestos is present. 

There are some applications where asbestos is the best material for the process – I’m thinking of the chlorine extraction process or use of asbestos containing gaskets. Chlorine certainly can be dangerous if something goes wrong or is mishandled, but without chlorine we’d not have thousands of very useful products. And people I know in industrial facilities tell me that asbestos gaskets are the best they’ve ever seen. Gaskets may not seem important, but let one fail and see what happens. 

What is this Significant New Use Rule and what does it mean?

Products that have been banned are supposedly still banned. The purpose of this rule is said to tighten restrictions on asbestos that were previously poorly defined, or weren’t defined at all. So are we going to have new products hit the market, or are we safer than ever? I can’t answer that – it appears that a company seeking to use asbestos has to apply for EPA approval and wait for a yes or no decision before going forward. I guess I’m comforted by the fact that EPA will review these applications on a case by case basis, but apparently EPA is not going to take into account known, indisputable facts on asbestos health effects. This makes no sense to me. I’m sure there’s some government-speak out there on some obscure, convoluted website that explains this in a never-ending series of run-on sentences, but I just don’t have it in me to find it. 

Whatever the real purpose, this is supposed to make us safer. Since that’s coming from the feds, I feel much better.

But for now, there’s supposed to be no new uses or products that are imminent.

In a kind-of related note, who would want to make and sell products with asbestos, besides the countries that still export? I wouldn’t want the hassle (and maybe the bad PR that could go with it) of trying to get products approved.


I don’t speak or read Russian, and haven’t verified this is a real photo, or the products shown contain asbestos, or the text on the labels and emblems, but this is so awesome that I had to put this here, since I guess we no longer import Canadian asbestos, instead opting for Russian asbestos. That’s because we’re in a trade war with Canada since Trump hates Trudeau and Putin is really giving Trump all his marching orders.

Why not just ban asbestos entirely? 

It’s interesting to note that the Significant New Use Rule on asbestos EPA factsheet points out that the previous administration had an opportunity to take action on this and make us safer but did nothing. But apparently George W. Bush didn’t have the same opportunity. I’m sure that’s merely poorly written and not an effort by Republican operatives in the EPA to make Democrats look bad. I mean, who would politicize environmental issues? I’m not an Obama supporter, but why go out of your way to say the Obama EPA did nothing on this, when by doing nothing, former EPA administrators weren’t allowing potential new uses (leading to the argument that they kind of were doing something)?

What does this mean for building owners? I’m concerned enough about asbestos that remains in buildings without adding to the worry if we install new asbestos containing materials. Imagine you’re a building owner that’s worked for years to become asbestos free, only to find you’ve installed MORE asbestos? 

What does this mean for architects and engineers? Interestingly, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) issued a statement calling for an outright ban on asbestos. I can’t say I blame the AIA – they’re looking out for their membership. Since architects are credited (or blamed!) for building material selection, they face huge potential risks. If you’re an architect and you’re asked to sign a statement that says your design didn’t include asbestos containing materials, proceed with caution if you don’t have test results to back them up.

What does this mean for contractors? In some U.S. states, pretty much anything goes when working on certain products that contain asbestos. Regardless of what government or industry experts may say, I’ve seen supposedly “safe” work practices that release significant asbestos fibers – in some cases enough to fail EPA clearance criteria for school projects. Not dust or particulate overloading – actual asbestos fiber counts that rendered the samples unreadable. I think this happens way more than is reported. Interestingly enough, no matter what EPA says, contractors still have to comply with OSHA standards for asbestos. Contractors may have a tough time complying with training and work practice requirements as a result of the Significant New Use Rule on asbestos. 


Given the irrefutable data on health effects from asbestos exposure, regulatory history, and litigation, I think building owners, architects, engineers, contractors, and anyone operating facilities could face huge risks – even if EPA came out and said all asbestos use were perfectly ok. 

This will probably get much more interesting as we see how industry and EPA officials react and the Significant New Use Rule on asbestos gets tested. And I’d be surprised if there weren’t a ton of litigation over this. Goodness knows we haven’t yet had enough on asbestos.



Recent Posts

Mold and moisture problem in a Louisiana school building
By Chris White August 31, 2026
Why does mold keep coming back in Louisiana schools? Learn how moisture, HVAC systems, leaks, and building conditions can cause recurring mold problems.
Indoor Air Quality Testing in a Hospital
By Chris White August 31, 2026
Learn how hospitals can investigate indoor air quality concerns, identify the source, and address mold, moisture, odors, and HVAC issues with minimal disruption to patient care.
Environmental Engineering Consultants in Louisiana
By Chris White August 2, 2026
Learn what Louisiana school districts should evaluate for asbestos, mold, moisture, lead paint and indoor air quality before renovating older schools.
By Chris White July 17, 2026
Imagine you’re sitting in your office when you notice a drip-drip-drip. You get the trash can out and put it under the leak-problem solved! Or is it? Does that water touch anything that supports mold growth, like the gypsum board ceiling or your ceiling tile? Do you notice odors after it rains? Do you notice dark fuzzy stuff around the leak or on your air conditioning vents? Mold might not be the end all bad stuff that some folks make it out to be. But if you or someone else notices it-it must be an aggravation at the very least-and it is causing pain of some sort, so let’s stop it, clean it up, and keep it from coming back. Just taking the time to talk about mold is hurting your productivity and there are known health affects of mold-let’s leave that topic for another day. Ten Things You Should Know About Mold: 1. Potential health effects and symptoms associated with mold exposures include allergic reactions, asthma, and other respiratory complaints. 2. There is no practical way to eliminate all mold and mold spores in the indoor environment; the way to control indoor mold growth is to control moisture. 3. If mold is a problem in your building, you must clean up the mold and eliminate sources of moisture. 4. Fix the source of the water problem or leak to prevent mold growth. 5. Reduce indoor humidity to decrease mold growth. 6. Clean and dry any damp or wet building materials and furnishings within 24-48 hours to prevent mold growth. 7. Clean mold off hard surfaces with water and detergent, and dry completely. 8. Prevent condensation. 9. In areas where there is a perpetual moisture problem, do not install carpeting. 10. Did I say stop the moisture? What to do if you have mold: 1. Stop the moisture (and keep it from coming back). 2. Clean up the mold (may require demolition). 3. Develop and implement a proactive moisture management plan. Do you need a professional engineer to design the remediation and repairs? As professional engineers, we are trained to analyze and find the cause of the problem, identify and evaluate the pros and cons of options, and offer you the solution that best fits your goals. This is the basis for design. We, as engineers, spend countless hours searching for options, learning about solutions, investigating products, and trying to understand the available technologies. We have long detailed conversations with experts on subjects like air sealing, water management, egress, health and safety, wind loads, indoor air quality, and structural loads. What to look for if you need professional help: A registered Professional Engineer who has 20 years in the industry and is experienced in solving mold related issues. Look for someone the experts call when they have a question-or when they’re too busy and they want to be sure their clients are taken care of. Someone who has a clear and well defined process that’s going to keep you informed and educated throughout the project so that you know what’s happening throughout each step and you have all the documentation to help eliminate or mitigate any future litigation you may encounter. Leave a comment or question below and I’ll send you a copy of a Proactive Moisture and Mold Management Program that you can use to help you avoid mold problems. Stay moldy, my friends. Chris White, P.E., LEED AP has been helping clients solve problems for 20 years. He is the Most Interesting Engineer in the World. You can follow him on Twitter @ChrisWhitePE .
By Chris White July 14, 2026
Why does stucco leak water into buildings? We get many calls about stucco and water intrusion. I have one friend (he develops buildings) who hates stucco. Why Stucco has been around for a long time. Think of the beautiful stucco structures that are over 100 years old. The stucco was used initially on full masonry walls. It helps shed water and in some cases provided a sacrificial protective service. Really good stuff. So why is it a problem now Well, today it’s used it on materials different from masonry. We put it on steel or wood framing. That’s different but not necessarily the kiss of death. Sometimes what looks like stucco is synthetic stucco or nontraditional stucco (I think of stucco being a three coat system). That’s different as well but not necessarily the kiss of death. Sometimes stucco is considered the sole protective weather barrier—not as an integral part of the cladding system, but as the only protective system. And this is almost always the kiss of death. What should I do if my stucco leaks First, find out where the water is entering the structure. Is it entering through the field of the stucco, at roof to wall connections (think of balconies as a mini-roof), or at openings (windows, doors, cable entrances, etc.)? If water is entering through the field of the stucco, you have a real problem. You’ll probably have to replace all of the stucco. If water is entering roof to wall connections or openings, you can remove the stucco in those areas, properly flash and prepare the openings, and repair the stucco. If you find structural damage because of the water intrusion, you’ll have to replace the damaged materials. What to watch for Well, you bought a stucco cladding system to begin with—how do you know you’ll get a proper system the second go around? That is the $64,000 question. You may not have picked up on it, but I have used the word system throughout the discussion above. Stucco is an important part of the cladding system and it has to be tied in with the water barrier. If you screw up the water barrier, it doesn’t matter what you use for cladding. Note, there are other parts to the cladding system. Stucco is not bad for buildings I like stucco. It is pretty, durable, and nearly maintenance free. But the entire cladding system has to be designed and built properly. If you need help reviewing or designing a cladding system or if you have questions or comments, send me an email. Also, I’d appreciate any photographs you have of failing stucco or of successful stucco repair projects.
By Chris White July 14, 2026
If you’re like me and not in the path of Hurricane Laura, you’ve spent a good bit of time watching Hurricane Laura news coverage. So far it looks like the surge wasn’t nearly as bad as predicted, but Hurricane Laura caused a tremendous amount of damage to Cameron and Calcasieu parishes and the surrounding areas. It’s also too soon to tell how much damage Hurricane Laura will cause as the storm moves inland and dissipates. What’s certain though, is Hurricane Laura will leave a considerable amount of water damage, resulting in water damage restoration and mold remediation. Hurricane Laura environmental cleanup is going to be a huge undertaking and will cause disturbance of asbestos, lead, PCB, and mercury. Proper removal and disposal of those materials is super important. Typically, storm coverage emphasizes water damage and mold remediation. Water damage restoration and mold remediation after Hurricane Laura will be the most obvious cleanup and restoration tasks. But everyone involved with Hurricane Laura environmental cleanup has to consider the other environmental hazards they could encounter. Hurricane Laura environmental cleanup will take time. Response work, particularly environmental cleanup, must balance speediness and caution. This is particularly important since we’ll want to get out right away and assess damage as soon as Hurricane Laura clears out. I know everyone wants to get in and get everything cleaned up and put back together. When we went through Hurricane Gustav (and other storms over the years), I was the same way. But sometimes hasty cleanup efforts can make more of a mess if we don’t slow down and assess all the potential environmental hazards in the work area. We may also put ourselves, co-workers, friends, and family at risk if we unknowingly create an environmental problem. Your safety is the most important consideration. Whether it’s water in the roadways, downed power lines, unstable structures, or contaminated water, make sure it’s safe to move around before you try to get in and assess the damage and environmental hazards. And when the storm is over, we often see hot temperatures return. Dehydration, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke are common problems people face. You’re stressed out and exhausted, and now you’re working in the heat, trying to put your home or business back together. Take care of yourself, then worry about contents – it’s worth repeating that you can always replace buildings and contents, but not people. You can replace buildings and contents, but not people. I won’t get too far into avoiding mold and mold remediation, other than to stress that you need to get the building clean and dry. Maybe Hurricane Laura is the only cause of the mold. Or maybe there’s an ongoing moisture problem that existed before the storm, and now the recovery work has led to discovery of other moisture problems. Find the cause, get the building dried out, cleaned up, and keep the mold from coming back. One other quick reminder on water damage restoration and mold remediation: there is no such thing as a Mold Free Certificate . There’s no requirement to get your home or building certified as “mold free” to make sure you can sell or rent a home or building. Anyone trying to sell you a mold free certificate is trying to scam you. Period. 
Show More